Acer Aspire E5-773

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-773  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire E5-773
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160122
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateJul 26 '22 at 22:47
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
43% Average
Memory 51.6
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 138
48% 84.8 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 174
26% 189 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 0983) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.49% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 5.7
4% 4.17 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 8.1
5% 5.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB-$90
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 192 138 234 221 162 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.2% Average
Read 218
Write 195
Mixed 203
SusWrite 203
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 10.4
36% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 222
192% 286 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 107%
Seagate OneTouch HDD 5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 79 50 93 82 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 71.6
Write 91.8
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 72.1
52% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
78% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KNG/8G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.3% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-773 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-773

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback