Acer Aspire V3-771

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-771  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA70_HC
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '22 at 21:14
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 175
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 432
47% 371 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0686) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 2
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.93 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 010G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 40 32 123 91 13 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.4% Average
Read 246
Write 189
Mixed 222
SusWrite 76.8
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 14.3
83% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 29.2
47% 91.2 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 70%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
449GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 96 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 78.6
Write 49.8
Mixed 49
SusWrite 95.8
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-771 Builds (Compare 819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-771

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback