Lenovo 3460CWG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 3460CWG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3460CWG
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '22 at 14:27
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3337U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 80.2
1-Core 69.2
2-Core 116
56% 88.3 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 170
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F9) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.16% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.8 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.16%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD5SG2256G1052E 256GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.04.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 388 372 292 272 203 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 408
Write 352
Mixed 161
SusWrite 317
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 21.4
73% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 136
132% 213 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5674BH0-YH9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB Chip DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46.4% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14.5
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3460CWG Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3460CWG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback