Axioo SlimBook 14 R5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemAxioo SlimBook 14 R5  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault CR14Q03
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '22 at 10:53
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 67.1
1-Core 115
2-Core 222
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 527
54% 433 Pts
64-Core 525
32% 525 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Device(2782 1100) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.44
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
9.17% Terrible
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 17.5
9% 12.9 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 14
Splatting 12
9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.17%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SDVPM21910256 256GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0510A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 402 398 411 420 270 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 409
Write 374
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 369
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 0.3
81% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 0.3
51% 120 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 71%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 16GB
14GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 56 34 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
38% Below average
Read 127
Write 53.8
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 32.8
68% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 3.7
273% 5.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.5% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 9.5
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 12.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SlimBook 14 R5 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Axioo SlimBook 14 R5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback