HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 84% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2271
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150309
Uptime9.9 Days
Run DateJul 26 '22 at 09:38
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 84%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core M-5Y51
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 76
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 104
54% 84.3 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 143
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 57%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTE256HMHP-000H1 256GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT22H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 200 191 181 176 181 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 429
Write 220
Mixed 164
SusWrite 191
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 17.5
80% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 76.7
110% 206 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida 746448-181 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 13
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 16
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook Folio 1020 G1 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback