Hp-pavilion NY553AA-ABA e9220y

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	73.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

23 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago.

System	Hp-pavilion NY553AA-ABA e9220y (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN ALOE
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090821
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '22 at 06:04
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 970 2,539 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Memory 81.4 1-Core 52.9 2-Core 106 51% 80.1 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 208 28% 206 Pts	64-Core 209 13% 209 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% PNY(196E 1347) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.08 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Lighting 91.9 Reflection 91.3 Parallax 84.1 75% 89.1 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 81.6 Splatting 73.6 72% 89.7 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 426GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 77 72 63 64 56 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	67.4% Good	Read 259 Write 228 Mixed 224 SusWrite 67.1 44% 194 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 72.2 4K Mixed 45.8 150% 50.9 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 46.3 59% 106 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 126%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 489GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 77 72 63 64 56 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 92.3 Write 87.7 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 67 58% 78.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-8500CL7-4GBRL00 F3-8500CL7-4GBRL00 F3-8500CL7-4GBRL00 F3-8500CL7-4GBRL00 16GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 11 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 8.3 20% 6.97 GB/s	Latency 78 51% 78 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical NY553AA-ABA e9220y Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion NY553AA-ABA e9220y

CPU
Phenom II X4 910AMDBench 51%, 593 samples	9x
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 970AMDBench 56%, 2,539 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples	4x
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	3x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	3x

SSD
840 Evo 1TBSamsung $199Bench 105%, 23,857 samples	3x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	2x
BX100 250GBCrucial $141Bench 87%, 42,930 samples	1x

RAM
16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 4x2GBMicronBench 38%, 515 samples	5x
F3-8500CL7-4GBRL00 F3-8500CL7-4GBRL00 F3-8500CL7-4GBRL00 F3-8500CL7-4GBRL00 16GBUnknownBench 30%, 45 samples	3x
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 16GBUnknownBench 34%, 166 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 23% - Poor

Total price: $199

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16