Lenovo 4391AJ4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 4391AJ4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4391AJ4
Memory6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100714
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJul 26 '22 at 05:23
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 820-$119
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 84
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 116
58% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 216
25% 196 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 880M
Legend(17AA 2145) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
2.35% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 1.3
2% 2.07 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 2.8
2% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.35%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 205 195 204 206 207 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.6% Above average
Read 223
Write 211
Mixed 200
SusWrite 203
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 23.9
79% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 140
114% 161 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5773DH0-CH9 859B CT51264BF160B.C16F 80AD HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 859B CT51264BF160B.C16F 12GB
1334, 1600, 1334, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.3% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 9.5
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4391AJ4 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4391AJ4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $219
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback