Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '22 at 23:01
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 169
2-Core 329
106% 197 Pts
4-Core 622
8-Core 924
96% 773 Pts
64-Core 1,156
72% 1,156 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 171
Parallax 170
136% 169 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 150
Splatting 125
123% 154 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 176 238 208 246 237 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 1,682
Write 826
Mixed 694
SusWrite 234
189% 858 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 50.8
181% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1049
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 253
274% 486 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 164%
Great: 243%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
87GB free
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 131 118 121 128 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 327
Write 207
Mixed 238
SusWrite 130
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 33.2
121% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 142
108% 145 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 85%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
190GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 205 79 80 82 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 517
Write 481
Mixed 410
SusWrite 164
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 43.9
142% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 219
173% 247 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 121%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 126 134 138 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 125
Write 118
Mixed 82.6
SusWrite 134
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 84%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
524GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 74 74 67 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 79.8
Write 82.3
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 73.9
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4400 C19 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 42.9
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 39.6
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 30.3
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 44.6
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 103%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC Builds (Compare 3,556 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $773
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback