Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire ES1-523

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire ES1-523  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer TRICERA_CZL
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '22 at 17:09
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-7010 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Memory 20.6
1-Core 21.4
2-Core 19.9
14% 20.6 Pts
4-Core 41.8
8-Core 42.7
6% 42.2 Pts
64-Core 42.9
3% 42.9 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Acer(1025 108A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.9
1% 2.1 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.6
2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Consistent C20S3 120GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0118A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 50 42 44 44 34 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 382
Write 305
Mixed 266
SusWrite 53.8
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 1
34% 9.57 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 61.9
DQ Mixed 28.2
35% 63.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 80%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
445GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 50 51 51 51 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 98.2
Write 56.8
Mixed 39.1
SusWrite 50.6
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
116% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 316
13% 316 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire ES1-523 Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire ES1-523

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback