Asus P8B75-M LX PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M LX PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140806
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 17 '17 at 06:12
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 3.00GHz
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 171
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 331
44% 333 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gigabyte(1458 3603) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Lighting 46.8
Reflection 42.4
Parallax 56.2
38% 48.5 fps
MRender 56.9
Gravity 53.3
Splatting 39.8
40% 50 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 410
Mixed 415
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 21.6
116% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 21.4
82% 185 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 134%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
798GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
62% Good
Read 101
Write 115
Mixed 104
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 2.37
4K Mixed 0.22
89% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
585GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 105
Write 117
Mixed 106
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 2.35
4K Mixed 0.2
87% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1866C9-8GXM 029E CMX16GX3M2A1600C11 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.5% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.2
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 17.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M LX PLUS Builds (Compare 547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LX PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $146
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback