Asus K50IN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemAsus K50IN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K50IN
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090722
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 25 '22 at 09:40
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T6600
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 65.1
1-Core 33.1
2-Core 67.2
37% 55.1 Pts
4-Core 65
8-Core 65.8
9% 65.4 Pts
64-Core 65.6
4% 65.6 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G102M
Asus(1043 19B4) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.3
1% 0.55 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU750 512GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA001R30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 179 153 166 192 190 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.8% Above average
Read 239
Write 192
Mixed 198
SusWrite 176
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 25.7
82% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 98.6
DQ Mixed 98.5
76% 104 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 113%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$27
370GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 56 61 64 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 62.3
Write 56.2
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 61.5
40% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 43%
Genesys USB3/SATA Bridge 320GB
183GB free, PID 0735
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 29 29 32 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 20.7
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 30.7
36% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.2
11% 3.87 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K50IN Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K50IN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback