TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell OptiPlex 3020

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex 3020
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 3020  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '22 at 08:20
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 93
2-Core 168
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 385
48% 367 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 73%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3450
Dell(1028 0342) 256MB
Driver: atidxx32 Ver. 8.56.1.16
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.65% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.8
1% 1 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 1.4
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 0% ↑
This bench: 0.65%
 Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 512GB
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 372 385 345 346 347 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 420
Write 266
Mixed 354
SusWrite 362
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 22.1
116% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 40.5
82% 160 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 82.8%
 Great: 107%
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: SN09610
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 227 229 215 230 224 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.6% Good
Read 206
Write 225
Mixed 208
SusWrite 225
49% 216 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 32.5
115% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 104
99% 156 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 65.6%
 Great: 313%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
3TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 174 171 168 173 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 138
Mixed 81
SusWrite 172
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 98%
 Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 18.3
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 16.8
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 57.3%
 Great: 58%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical OptiPlex 3020 Builds (Compare 6,548 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 3020

CPU
Core i5-4590Intel  $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples2,363x
Core i5-4570Intel  $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples1,490x
Core i3-4130Intel  $41Bench 52%, 49,509 samples497x
GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples1,747x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples654x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples495x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples246x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples130x
MX500 500GBCrucial  $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples95x
RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples346x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples217x
HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 52%, 14,558 samples177x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback