Digibras NM70-I

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDigibras NM70-I  (all builds)
MotherboardDigiboard NM70-I
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20121130
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 23:01
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 847-$259
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
32.7% Below average
Memory 56.3
1-Core 28.8
2-Core 57.5
32% 47.5 Pts
4-Core 55.1
8-Core 57.6
8% 56.3 Pts
64-Core 56.9
4% 56.9 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 2111) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.61% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.73 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 0.5
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.61%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1A30Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 129 173 177 178 175 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41% Average
Read 237
Write 213
Mixed 207
SusWrite 172
47% 207 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 8.2
58% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 88.2
DQ Mixed 13.2
34% 71.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41%
Great: 81%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
25GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 3.5 3.6 3.8 3.5 3.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
9.5% Terrible
Read 21
Write 14.3
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 3.8
17% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.1
137% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.5%
Great: 18%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 2.6 2.8 2.4 2.6 3.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-046.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
25.6% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.7
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NM70-I Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Digibras NM70-I

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback