Asrock B360M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B360M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180502
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 20:37
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 109
2-Core 244
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 715
74% 599 Pts
64-Core 711
44% 711 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
MSI(1462 8A90) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1203 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.6
Reflection 28.2
Parallax 20.6
12% 21.1 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 20
17% 20.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 208 206 200 199 192 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 437
Write 303
Mixed 272
SusWrite 207
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 32.4
133% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 218
192% 289 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 85%
Great: 128%
Seagate Backup+ SL 500GB
53GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 65 66 65 66 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 64.6
Write 37.7
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 64.4
68% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 22.6
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 25.4
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock B360M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $232
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback