Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte G1.Sniper B5
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit barev, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 19:11
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 89.5
1-Core 125
2-Core 220
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 645
71% 559 Pts
64-Core 617
38% 617 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Lighting 74.5
Reflection 78.5
Parallax 71.3
61% 74.8 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 74
Splatting 70.2
57% 70 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 236 237 238 241 247 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
79.6% Very good
Read 249
Write 238
Mixed 221
SusWrite 222
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 45.8
152% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 193
145% 193 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0. 1315 BLT4G3D1608DT1TX0. 1315 BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0. 1315 BLT4G3D1608DT1TX0. 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.8% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF Builds (Compare 760 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback