Foxconn H61MXV/H61MXV-LE/H67MXV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardFoxconn H61MXV/H61MXV-LE/H67MXV  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140103
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 18:06
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$201
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 191
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 471
52% 410 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
EVGA(3842 2710) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 4.5
4% 4.47 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: p0617a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 119 95 129 85 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 167
Write 106
Mixed 140
SusWrite 98.4
29% 128 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 23.2
79% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 20.3
DQ Write 89.4
DQ Mixed 29.4
30% 46.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
628GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 194 191 194 196 195 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 86.7
Mixed 83.1
SusWrite 188
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.8% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 2.5
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61MXV/H61MXV-LE/H67MXV Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H61MXV/H61MXV-LE/H67MXV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback