Gigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H87-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 15:37
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 205
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 549
53% 435 Pts
64-Core 549
34% 549 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Gigabyte(1458 2312) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1618 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15% Very poor
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 50.7
Parallax 75.6
0% 42.1 fps
MRender 59.6
Gravity 62
Splatting 43.4
44% 55 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 15%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 286 272 248 153 63 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 429
Write 280
Mixed 206
SusWrite 215
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 35
140% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 121
123% 201 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 89%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
613GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 394 406 392 339 413 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 351
Write 467
Mixed 371
SusWrite 392
90% 395 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 40.3
146% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 351
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 121%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB
339GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 89 93 93 93 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 104
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 92.6
64% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 76%
Asmt 2115 500GB
396GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 49 44 45 54 53 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 102
Write 45.3
Mixed 16
SusWrite 49.4
38% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 67%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
3GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 89.2
Write 75.7
Mixed 64.3
95% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.4
160% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 65%
BUFFALO HD-PCTU3 1TB
627GB free, PID 01de
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 96 98 96 96 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
42% Average
Read 93.5
Write 67.7
Mixed 58
SusWrite 95.8
105% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
114% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 42%
Great: 43%
WD My Book 1234 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 140 143 141 138 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58% Above average
Read 135
Write 138
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 141
168% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 58%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173CB0-CK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.4
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 16.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H87-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $156
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback