Toshiba Satellite C50-A490

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemToshiba Satellite C50-A490  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA PT10S
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131014
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 08:03
Run Duration457 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 69.6
2-Core 138
60% 98.1 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 221
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 710M
Toshiba(1179 FA36) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 1
4% 3.43 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 3.7
3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125
354GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA2OA700
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 88 86 74 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 82.8
Write 84.2
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 84.7
52% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
30.2% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.6
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 7.8
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C50-A490 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C50-A490

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $67
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback