Asus ProArt StudioBook W700G1T_W700G1T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics38.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ProArt StudioBook W700G1T_W700G1T  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK W700G1T
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210910
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJul 22 '22 at 20:58
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 86.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 250
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 716
74% 595 Pts
64-Core 871
54% 871 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro T1000
Asus(1043 1AC1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1169
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.1% Below average
Lighting 49.4
Reflection 43.9
Parallax 39.7
40% 44.3 fps
MRender 42.2
Gravity 40.5
Splatting 41.3
34% 41.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 41%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLB1T0HALR-00000 1TB
760GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1299 1142 1145 1141 1145 1158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2,212
Write 2,265
Mixed 1,612
SusWrite 1,172
407% 1,815 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 67.3
218% 73.1 MB/s
DQ Read 900
DQ Write 672
DQ Mixed 774
582% 782 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 263%
Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
87.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 26.6
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 27.5
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProArt StudioBook W700G1T_W700G1T Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ProArt StudioBook W700G1T_W700G1T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback