Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 8250e Triple-Core 63 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Memory 63.2 1-Core 28.6 2-Core 57.2 34% 49.7 Pts	4-Core 84.2 8-Core 83.9 11% 84.1 Pts	64-Core 84.4 5% 84.4 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon X1200 Series Asus(1043 826D) 128MB Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.56.1.16 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.2 Reflection 0.3 0% 0.25 fps

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB 4,962 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0817B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 155 36 34 36 36 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.9% Poor	Read 235 Write 198 Mixed 45.6 SusWrite 78.4 31% 139 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 25.3 4K Mixed 3 49% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 26.1 DQ Write 75.3 DQ Mixed 0.5 15% 34 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 5GB 14,654 User benchmarks, average bench 18% null MHz 1024, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 7.2 19% 6.5 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.9 12% 4.33 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+AMDBench 36%, 5,372 samples	4x
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	3x
Phenom 9550AMDBench 43%, 2,773 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce 8500 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 4,580 samples	3x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	3x
GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples	2x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	2x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x
Force GT 120GBCorsair $155Bench 69%, 13,464 samples	1x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16