Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z270X-Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '22 at 13:50
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 94%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Memory 36.9
1-Core 11.3
2-Core 29.3
18% 25.8 Pts
4-Core 38.9
8-Core 60.6
6% 49.8 Pts
64-Core 68.5
4% 68.5 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.6% Below average
Lighting 28.7
Reflection 25
Parallax 49.6
23% 34.4 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 70.6
Splatting 68.9
56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 126 133 117 152 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 343
Write 325
Mixed 325
SusWrite 149
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 29.9
4K Mixed 18.3
70% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 89.2
DQ Mixed 104
77% 101 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 122%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 95 119 102 124 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 110
Write 131
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 117
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 103 130 108 146 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 157
Write 101
Mixed 68
SusWrite 128
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 114%
Sony DSC 125GB
43GB free, PID 0ca8
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 3.8 4 3.8 4.8 3.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.2% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 4.2
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 4.7
14% 13 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.4
151% 2.43 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSC.16FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
29.2% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 11.4
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 4.8
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 217
18% 217 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,870 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $735
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback