Asus K50AD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus K50AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K50AD
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091113
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 22 '22 at 13:29
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion II Mobile M500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Memory 43.8
1-Core 31.8
2-Core 63.1
29% 46.2 Pts
4-Core 63.5
8-Core 60.9
8% 62.2 Pts
64-Core 60.5
4% 60.5 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4500
Asus(1043 1B42) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.3% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.5
1% 2.07 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.3%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 193 191 191 192 199 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.3% Below average
Read 228
Write 200
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 190
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 0.8
26% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 35.7
DQ Mixed 28.3
34% 62.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown B2YJ2SG4FN1 B2YJ2SG4FN1 4GB
400, 400 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
20.4% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 8.1
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K50AD Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K50AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback