Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

22 months ago, 21 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7100U 37,239 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Memory 74 1-Core 73.1 2-Core 127 56% 91.5 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 203 26% 196 Pts	64-Core 204 13% 204 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 387,149 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Intel(8086 2070) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	3.99% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 6 Parallax 6.8 5% 6.27 fps	MRender 0.3 Gravity 8.5 Splatting 0.2 2% 3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.99% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
M.2 (S80) 3ME4 32GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: L17606 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 49 50 49 50 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.7% Average	Read 313 Write 49.4 Mixed 82.4 SusWrite 48.8 27% 123 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 45.9 4K Mixed 20.3 100% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 45.8 DQ Mixed 54 47% 71.8 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G4SFS824A.M8FE 2x4GB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.1% Very good	MC Read 25 MC Write 29 MC Mixed 22.9 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 27.6 SC Mixed 21.4 60% 21.1 GB/s	Latency 92.4 43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 109%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-7100UIntelBench 43%, 37,239 samples	46x

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	46x

SSD
SSDSCKKR128G8 128GBIntelBench 71%, 31 samples	6x
WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GBWDCBench 43%, 30,897 samples	3x
850 EVO M.2 500GBSamsungBench 110%, 25,072 samples	2x

RAM
9905704-007.A00G 1x4GBKingstonBench 37%, 16 samples	3x
9905704-007.A00G 2x4GBKingstonBench 53%, 16 samples	3x
9905711-004.A00G 99U5711-001.A00G 8GBKingstonBench 67%, 6 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16