HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-1xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 109% UFO	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 102% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago.

System	HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-1xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 886B
Memory	5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210827
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '22 at 23:02
Run Duration	325 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-11400F-$116 46,609 User benchmarks, average bench 94% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Memory 69.1 1-Core 140 2-Core 292 88% 167 Pts	4-Core 509 8-Core 795 80% 652 Pts	64-Core 998 62% 998 Pts
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% HP(103C 88D4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	131% Outstanding	Lighting 183 Reflection 176 Parallax 156 149% 172 fps	MRender 190 Gravity 136 Splatting 118 118% 148 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WD BLACK SDBPNTY-512G-1106 512GB 3,022 User benchmarks, average bench 210% 205GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 756 668 648 625 624 592 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	192% Outstanding	Read 1,584 Write 1,293 Mixed 1,192 SusWrite 652 264% 1,180 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 51.7 181% 66.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,052 DQ Write 420 DQ Mixed 1,007 674% 826 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 192% Great: 285%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 380GB free Firmware: 04.01A04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 96 96 96 96 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 163 Write 132 Mixed 85.7 SusWrite 95.2 88% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP37D4U1S8ME-8XR 2x8GB 6,088 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	MC Read 33.3 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 26 83% 29.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 24.9 SC Mixed 20.2 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-1xxx Builds (Compare 1,293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 99%

Nuclear submarine

System: HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-1xxx

CPU
Core i7-11700FIntelBench 98%, 21,161 samples	372x
Ryzen 7 5700GAMD $174Bench 88%, 17,091 samples	226x
Core i7-11700Intel $225Bench 98%, 20,430 samples	177x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	525x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	299x
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	260x

SSD
WD BLACK SDBPNTY-512G-1106 512GBWDCBench 210%, 3,022 samples	412x
WD BLACK SDBPNTY-1T00-1106 1TBWDCBench 236%, 4,202 samples	188x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1006 512GBWDCBench 156%, 9,997 samples	144x

RAM
HP37D4U1S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 2,284 samples	405x
HP37D4U1S8ME-8XR 2x8GBKingstonBench 90%, 6,088 samples	336x
HP37D4U1S8MR-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 95%, 903 samples	93x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $283

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16