Dell Latitude 5580

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Latitude 5580  (all builds)
MotherboardDell
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211215
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 21 '22 at 16:54
Run Duration88 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 190
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 272
36% 269 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 930MX
Dell(1028 07A8) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1175
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
8.43% Terrible
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 10.7
9% 10.6 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 7.9
7% 8.23 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.43%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON SA2000M 500GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z44101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,257
Write 880
Mixed 647
205% 928 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 77.2
259% 94.2 MB/s
DQ Read 958
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 467
380% 561 MB/s
Poor: 108% Great: 268%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471A1K43CB1-CRC 80AD000080AD HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 21.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 21.1
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude 5580 Builds (Compare 2,097 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude 5580

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback