Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	63.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	240GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 240GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4 159 User benchmarks, average bench 47% None, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	61.5% Good	Memory 66.4 1-Core 82.6 2-Core 164 60% 104 Pts	4-Core 303 8-Core 623 54% 463 Pts	64-Core 2,027 126% 2,027 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 64%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 376GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 317 369 372 348 373 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Read 416 Write 374 Mixed 334 SusWrite 332 82% 364 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 22.4 4K Mixed 17.8 58% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 235 DQ Mixed 77.8 93% 159 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 91%
Samsung MZ7LM960 960GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 670GB free Firmware: 0M3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 406 423 423 403 423 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Read 411 Write 411 Mixed 357 SusWrite 414 90% 398 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 28.9 4K Mixed 21.5 69% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 237 DQ Mixed 115 114% 180 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 112%
Samsung MZ7LM960 960GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 405GB free Firmware: 0M3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 404 423 410 397 423 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Read 416 Write 417 Mixed 340 SusWrite 411 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 26.3 4K Mixed 21 68% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 83.9 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 149 117% 157 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None 67GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 132% 0, 0, 0 MHz 3968, 32767, 32767 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	MC Read 64.1 MC Write 51.1 MC Mixed 52.1 159% 55.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 14.6 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 412%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,058x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	827x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325