Digiboard G41M-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemMSI CU-7592
MotherboardDigiboard G41M-S  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110412
Uptime8.7 Days
Run DateJul 21 '22 at 16:26
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 42.3
2-Core 90.8
44% 68 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 179
23% 176 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Gigabyte(1458 22B2) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.67% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 2
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2
2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.67%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
792GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3402101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 192 213 190 128 124 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.9% Below average
Read 199
Write 155
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 171
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 10.3
67% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 23.9
DQ Write 71.5
DQ Mixed 11.9
19% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.4% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G41M-S Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Digiboard G41M-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback