Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-R R2.0  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191011
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJul 21 '22 at 15:29
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User UZB-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100-$114
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 130
2-Core 254
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 451
64% 469 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
4.74% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 7.4
5% 6.07 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 0.1
4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.74%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMBB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 197 111 265 77 187 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 381
Write 388
Mixed 313
SusWrite 199
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 41
144% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 30.5
DQ Write 87.4
DQ Mixed 41.1
36% 53 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KVR24N17S8/4 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.2% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 7.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 9.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H310M-R R2.0 Builds (Compare 4,254 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback