Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Designare-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 105% UFO	Desktop 109% UFO	Workstation 92% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	96.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	322% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte Z170X-Designare
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Designare-CF (all builds)
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170823
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '17 at 11:28
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Memory 96.6 1-Core 160 2-Core 316 104% 191 Pts	4-Core 607 8-Core 882 93% 745 Pts	64-Core 887 55% 887 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2284 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	Lighting 121 Reflection 129 Parallax 111 98% 120 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 110 Splatting 114 92% 112 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 21,542 User benchmarks, average bench 238% 442GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	322% Outstanding	Read 2,851 Write 1,602 Mixed 1,896 467% 2,116 MB/s	4K Read 56.4 4K Write 195 4K Mixed 76.6 287% 109 MB/s	DQ Read 540 DQ Write 445 DQ Mixed 239 248% 408 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 322% Great: 306%
WD Blue 250GB-$90 26,761 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 187GB free Firmware: X41100WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2620 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 370 (A5) Unknown 100 100 30117593636 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 68 (A8) Unknown 100 100 8 (A9) Unknown 100 100 266 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3 (AE) Unknown 100 100 215 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 62 55 236224905254 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 1340032549176 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 911 (EA) Unknown 100 100 3984 (F1) Unknown 253 253 3100 (F2) Unknown 253 253 4415 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	91.6% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 348 Mixed 332 87% 392 MB/s	4K Read 39.9 4K Write 78.9 4K Mixed 23 132% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 345 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 43.2 93% 195 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 264GB free Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 62371032 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 37 37 65535 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 292546524 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 23804 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1191 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 21475360860 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 51 572260385 (C2) HDA temperature 33 49 60129542177 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 21 11 62371032 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 1 1247822 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -103126459716707 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1914780156 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2126847739	66.7% Good	Read 115 Write 118 Mixed 112 86% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.5 110% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB-$169 37,519 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 39.2 MC Write 44.4 MC Mixed 33.6 112% 39.1 GB/s	SC Read 23.4 SC Write 48.4 SC Mixed 33.3 100% 35 GB/s	Latency 51.9 77% 51.9 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z170X-Designare-CF Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 70%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 60%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Designare-CF

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	70x
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	18x
Core i5-6600KIntel $130Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	22x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	17x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	8x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	6x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	6x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	3x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 82%, 74,390 samples	6x
TMA851U6AFR6N-UHSC Kingston 9905678-014.A00G Kingston 9905678-014.A00G Kingston 9905678-014.A00G 16GBUnknownBench 79%, 10 samples	5x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $462

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16