HP 500-477nf

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP 500-477nf  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140718
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 16 '17 at 10:45
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 82
2-Core 137
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 284
37% 278 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
HP(103C 6893) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.46
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 12
Parallax 9.31
10% 11.4 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 13
10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
616GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 165
Mixed 159
130% 173 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.21
85% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
929GB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 111
Write 106
Mixed 97.2
134% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.21
67% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 99U5584-009.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.2% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 8.2
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-477nf Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-477nf

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $164
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback