Lenovo 20202

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20202  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '22 at 14:27
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3632QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 155
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 400
42% 338 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3904) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2932
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.86% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 1.6
2% 1.63 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.86%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3K87RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 157 91 86 93 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 435
Write 400
Mixed 333
SusWrite 142
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 24
80% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 180
164% 250 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 88%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
6GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.7 4.9 5.7 5.8 6 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 13
Write 8.5
Mixed 3
SusWrite 4.8
9% 7.32 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.5
171% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
32.8% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 11
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20202 Builds (Compare 514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20202

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback