Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 201%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 198%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics226% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 20 '22 at 04:09
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$504
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 126
2-Core 248
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 871
81% 673 Pts
64-Core 1,348
84% 1,348 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-Ti
EVGA(3842 4985) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
226% Outstanding
Lighting 324
Reflection 315
Parallax 366
264% 335 fps
MRender 399
Gravity 320
Splatting 210
243% 310 fps
Poor: 205%
This bench: 226%
Great: 247%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,252
Write 1967
Mixed 1,414
417% 1,878 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 80
275% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 903
DQ Write 668
DQ Mixed 764
577% 779 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
72GB free
Firmware: 3B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 147 153 154 154 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 407
Write 131
Mixed 184
SusWrite 152
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 19.9
86% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 53.1
DQ Mixed 96.2
90% 148 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 76%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 2TB
665GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 171 179 179 180 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 752
Write 172
Mixed 299
SusWrite 170
76% 348 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 37.8
136% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 652
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 393
308% 436 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 102%
Great: 319%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
592GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 151 152 150 150 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 155
Write 143
Mixed 118
SusWrite 150
105% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16G-D4-2800-MR 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 58.6
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 53.4
148% 51.9 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 25.1
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 61.1
65% 61.1 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 132%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,075 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $934
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback