Acer Aspire E5-551G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-551G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_KV
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '22 at 03:23
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7300 APU (2014 M.Ka)
Socket FP3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Memory 54
1-Core 18.6
2-Core 44.7
27% 39.1 Pts
4-Core 68.1
8-Core 77.6
10% 72.8 Pts
64-Core 87.2
5% 87.2 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
Acer(1025 0864) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
2.55% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 4.7
2% 4.1 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.55%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-GEN06SM19EG240GBSS 240GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0212B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 205 44 50 42 49 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.8% Poor
Read 230
Write 182
Mixed 169
SusWrite 86.1
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 15.9
4K Mixed 0.7
21% 8.17 MB/s
DQ Read 71.2
DQ Write 92.2
DQ Mixed 44.9
44% 69.4 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 93%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
668GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 102 95 98 98 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 79.2
Write 83.2
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 96
56% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D3R8GS16B8R 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.5% Poor
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 12.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 7
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-551G Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-551G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 13% - Very poor Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback