Chuwi HeroBook Pro+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemChuwi HeroBook Pro+  (all builds)
MotherboardCHUWI HeroBook Pro+
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210122
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateJul 20 '22 at 03:16
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3450
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Memory 26.5
1-Core 29.7
2-Core 48.2
21% 34.8 Pts
4-Core 67
8-Core 72.4
9% 69.7 Pts
64-Core 71.4
4% 71.4 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Device(1E63 002E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.57% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1
Parallax 1.1
0% 0.9 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 0.3
1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.57%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M.2 2280 SATA SSD 256GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PAFEC2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 115 46 114 53 105 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.4% Poor
Read 201
Write 108
Mixed 121
SusWrite 78.3
28% 127 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 4.8
37% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 94
DQ Write 86.1
DQ Mixed 64.7
56% 81.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 276
14% 276 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HeroBook Pro+ Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Chuwi HeroBook Pro+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback