Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199 39,605 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Memory 81.5 1-Core 75.5 2-Core 145 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 184 8-Core 266 28% 225 Pts	64-Core 266 16% 266 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M 15,328 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C0C1) 1GB Driver: Ver. 21.21.13.7654 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	3.21% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 5.9 Parallax 2 3% 3.9 fps	MRender 5.7 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 3.2 3% 4.37 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.21% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900612 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 84 42 45 30 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Read 402 Write 294 Mixed 302 SusWrite 53.2 58% 263 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 11.8 4K Mixed 1.3 39% 11.2 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 33.7 DQ Mixed 29.9 41% 79.1 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 029E CMSX8GX3M1A1600C10 16GB 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.8% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 17.5 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 11.3 32% 11 GB/s	Latency 77.8 51% 77.8 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	138x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	56x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	10x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	31x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 6GBSamsungBench 36%, 2,424 samples	21x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	18x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $249

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16