Fujitsu AMILO Li1705

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.01%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 94% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemFujitsu AMILO Li1705  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU AMILO Li1705
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1280x800x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20070215
Uptime138.9 Days
Run DateJul 19 '22 at 16:26
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 85%
CPU Throttled 94%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Duo T2450
mPGA 479M, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.01% Terrible
Memory 11.9
1-Core 13.7
2-Core 20.7
9% 15.4 Pts
4-Core 25.1
8-Core 19.3
3% 22.2 Pts
64-Core 21.3
1% 21.3 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 8.01%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600BEVS-22UST0 160GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.01G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 32 21 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 30
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 32.5
21% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
4.44% Terrible
MC Read 1.5
MC Write 1.8
MC Mixed 1.2
4% 1.5 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 1
SC Mixed 0.4
2% 0.6 GB/s
Latency 386
10% 386 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.44%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback