Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507RR_FA507RR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507RR_FA507RR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA507RR
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '22 at 13:25
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Memory 76.2
1-Core 163
2-Core 326
99% 189 Pts
4-Core 637
8-Core 1,072
104% 854 Pts
64-Core 1,485
92% 1,485 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B00 1TB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7301Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1070 760 337 282 176 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,482
Write 1447
Mixed 1,602
SusWrite 452
280% 1,246 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 69.7
240% 86.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,235
DQ Write 938
DQ Mixed 989
766% 1,054 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 209%
Great: 283%
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1TB
856GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 381 377 382 381 367 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 350
Write 379
Mixed 336
SusWrite 377
497% 360 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 18.3
1,721% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 26.4
DQ Write 38.3
DQ Mixed 30.7
2,445% 31.8 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 230%
Great: 232%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
112% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 45.1
MC Mixed 37.9
118% 41.3 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 50.1
SC Mixed 27.5
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 112%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507RR_FA507RR Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507RR_FA507RR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback