Positivo N1250

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPositivo N1250  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo N14DP7-V2
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210916
Uptime12.1 Days
Run DateJul 18 '22 at 19:24
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N5030
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
38.1% Below average
Memory 42.8
1-Core 66.6
2-Core 128
44% 79 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 192
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
2.56% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 2.6
2% 2.47 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 5.7
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.56%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BIWIN_C6370_128GB 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0311A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 332 101 88 90 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
67% Good
Read 396
Write 344
Mixed 347
SusWrite 170
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 23.4
102% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 48.5
87% 166 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
28.1% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 12.4
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 190
21% 190 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N1250 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo N1250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback