Monster ABRA A5 V5.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V5.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V5.2
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '22 at 18:10
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 35%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 186
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 428
41% 340 Pts
64-Core 485
30% 485 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 5600
Clevo(1558 0150) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
4.79% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 8.3
5% 6.33 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 5.5
5% 5.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.79%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$105
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 969 347 308 307 307 310 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 15.7
Write 960
Mixed 655
SusWrite 424
119% 514 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 19.4
4K Mixed 39.1
101% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 460
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 417
300% 390 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 76%
Great: 280%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99[2/7]218 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
32.7% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 9.9
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V5.2 Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V5.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback