Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	16.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210930
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '22 at 20:20
Run Duration	293 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Memory 93.8 1-Core 133 2-Core 248 90% 158 Pts	4-Core 462 8-Core 802 76% 632 Pts	64-Core 957 59% 957 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Nvidia(10DE 12AD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	18.8% Very poor	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 5 2% 3.07 fps	MRender 83.7 Gravity 124 Splatting 3.8 51% 70.6 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 321GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 763 582 479 511 604 582 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	161% Outstanding	Read 1,650 Write 1,247 Mixed 654 SusWrite 587 230% 1,035 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 38 4K Mixed 35.9 119% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 904 DQ Write 81.3 DQ Mixed 130 186% 372 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 161% Great: 254%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 89GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 224 180 203 189 154 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 421 Write 247 Mixed 201 SusWrite 199 59% 267 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 25.3 4K Mixed 20 68% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 290 DQ Write 70.4 DQ Mixed 112 100% 157 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 86%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB 9,173 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 32GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 23 26 12 30 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	8.52% Terrible	Read 24.2 Write 9.4 Mixed 13.7 SusWrite 19.4 21% 16.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.2 19% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.52% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2Z3600C18 4x8GB 9,005 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	91.1% Outstanding	MC Read 33.1 MC Write 36.6 MC Mixed 27.2 92% 32.3 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 38.3 SC Mixed 28 80% 28.1 GB/s	Latency 60.2 66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 125%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	539x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	501x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	430x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	563x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	511x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	473x

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $986

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16