AMD Annapurna CRB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics23.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAMD Annapurna CRB  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190716
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 17 '22 at 19:09
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4555M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Memory 49.5
1-Core 18.1
2-Core 50.8
26% 39.5 Pts
4-Core 78.1
8-Core 73.9
10% 76 Pts
64-Core 72.1
4% 72.1 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.2% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 35.5
Parallax 41.4
21% 34.2 fps
MRender 40.5
Gravity 31.9
Splatting 30.2
28% 34.2 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJS600M256C 256GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1231A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 35 160 52 103 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 420
Write 328
Mixed 322
SusWrite 115
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 18.4
73% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 43.1
53% 94.2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 98%
Asmt 2115 1TB
898GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 96 98 96 82 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 111
Write 109
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 98.3
69% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
20.8% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 5.8
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Annapurna CRB Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: AMD Annapurna CRB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback