Asrock Q1900DC-ITX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock Q1900DC-ITX  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '22 at 12:23
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 97%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1900
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Memory 55.3
1-Core 20.2
2-Core 43.7
28% 39.7 Pts
4-Core 83.3
8-Core 78.5
11% 80.9 Pts
64-Core 83.9
5% 83.9 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.4% Average
Lighting 59.4
Reflection 62.7
Parallax 58
48% 60 fps
MRender 62.9
Gravity 65.3
Splatting 60.3
51% 62.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 256GB 256GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R025C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 160 195 204 179 167 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.8% Average
Read 236
Write 225
Mixed 208
SusWrite 175
48% 211 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 22.2
76% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 167
119% 149 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston SNY1333D3S9ELC/4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.1% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 7.6
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q1900DC-ITX Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Q1900DC-ITX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback