TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 250%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 261%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics216% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '22 at 12:16
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600K-$170
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 85.6
1-Core 204
2-Core 405
121% 232 Pts
4-Core 818
8-Core 1,431
136% 1,124 Pts
64-Core 1,968
122% 1,968 Pts
Poor: 100% ↑
This bench: 119%
 Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
PNY(196E 1384) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 4827 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
216% Outstanding
Lighting 321
Reflection 430
Parallax 368
261% 373 fps
MRender 353
Gravity 262
Splatting 192
211% 269 fps
Poor: 162% ↑
This bench: 216%
 Great: 225%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 671 334 337 337 337 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 2,529
Write 1,465
Mixed 1,116
SusWrite 391
303% 1,375 MB/s
4K Read 70.6
4K Write 241
4K Mixed 100
363% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 1,501
DQ Mixed 1,004
826% 1,160 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑
This bench: 292%
 Great: 280%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 CMH16GX4M2D3600C18 CMH16GX4M2D3600C18 CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 32GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 46.1
MC Write 46.2
MC Mixed 42.4
128% 44.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 47.5
SC Mixed 29.8
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 122%
 Great: 122%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 15,811 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 - $181

CPU
Core i7-12700KIntel  $215Bench 114%, 78,749 samples6,820x
Core i5-12600KIntel  $170Bench 109%, 101,563 samples2,698x
Core i9-12900KIntel  $264Bench 117%, 66,991 samples2,448x
GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia  $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples1,791x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia  $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples1,614x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples1,579x
SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples1,879x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples1,061x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung  $155Bench 416%, 138,083 samples922x
RAM
CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 96%, 45,582 samples639x
Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVK 2x16GBGBench 94%, 11,497 samples506x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 90%, 101,975 samples459x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,382
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback