Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	15.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

22 months ago, 22 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium T4500 8,800 User benchmarks, average bench 34% uPGA-478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Memory 50.1 1-Core 33.8 2-Core 45.9 30% 43.3 Pts	4-Core 56.4 8-Core 60.5 8% 58.5 Pts	64-Core 57.5 4% 57.5 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 0459) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	1.3% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.3 0% 0.4 fps	MRender 0.5 Gravity 11.7 Splatting 0.5 3% 4.23 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 1.3% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB 15,567 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM91.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 127 99 129 119 98 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	15.5% Very poor	Read 116 Write 141 Mixed 118 SusWrite 115 28% 123 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 3.7 12% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.8 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 0.9 5% 1.77 GB/s	Latency 160 25% 160 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium T4500IntelBench 34%, 8,800 samples	15x

GPU
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	15x

SSD
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	2x
830 64GBSamsungBench 53%, 4,094 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16