Sony SVT14115CLS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSony SVT14115CLS  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130313
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 17 '22 at 03:55
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 72.8
1-Core 64.9
2-Core 106
51% 81.1 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 136
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sony(104D 90A8) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.75% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 2.4
3% 2.4 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.75%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMPC032HBCD-000 12GB
7GB free
Firmware: CXM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 33 33 32 58 59 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.8% Poor
Read 198
Write 85.5
Mixed 131
SusWrite 42.7
25% 114 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 13.9
57% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 59.7
DQ Write 28.5
DQ Mixed 28.4
25% 38.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 42%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
853GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 29 102 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 191
Write 82
Mixed 112
SusWrite 51.9
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 3.3
1,167% 7.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 18
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 14.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SVT14115CLS Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Sony SVT14115CLS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback