_________________________________

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	71.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	__ ___________________________________ (all builds)
Motherboard	__ ____
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210802
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 16 '22 at 21:45
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Not Available 40 User benchmarks, average bench 96% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	37.9% Below average	Memory 51.9 1-Core 37.8 2-Core 78.3 35% 56 Pts	4-Core 129 8-Core 310 25% 220 Pts	64-Core 543 34% 543 Pts
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% HP(103C 8556) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.95 Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	71.9% Very good	Lighting 91.7 Reflection 89.3 Parallax 89.5 75% 90.2 fps	MRender 89.4 Gravity 84.8 Splatting 72.5 66% 82.2 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB 31,797 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: ADHA0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 236 265 238 221 206 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 494 Write 275 Mixed 339 SusWrite 246 75% 338 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 8.4 4K Mixed 7.9 33% 9.47 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 28.1 DQ Mixed 37.8 51% 98.6 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 147%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 912GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 139 162 179 186 177 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 195 Write 177 Mixed 85.4 SusWrite 170 114% 157 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.1 207% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GB 8,406 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	MC Read 17 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 14.4 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 10.2 30% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 154 26% 154 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ___________________________________ Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 108%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

System: _________________________________

CPU
AvailableNotBench 96%, 40 samples	2x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	1x

SSD
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	1x

RAM
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 46%, 8,406 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 130% - Outstanding

Total price: $210

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

__ ___________________________________

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: __ ___________________________________

Feedback

_________________________________

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

System: _________________________________