Lenovo HuronRiver Platform

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo HuronRiver Platform  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Emerald Lake
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '22 at 20:54
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 77.1
1-Core 74.8
2-Core 115
56% 89.1 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 180
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Legend(17AA 397D) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1.18% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 1.2
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.18%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 120 21 75 113 15 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.9% Poor
Read 137
Write 82.2
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 76.3
21% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 8.5
33% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 15.7
DQ Write 16.5
DQ Mixed 13.4
11% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
296GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 71 72 71 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 66.5
Write 70.4
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 71.3
47% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HuronRiver Platform Builds (Compare 705 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo HuronRiver Platform

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback