MSI B360M GAMING PLUS (MS-7B19)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics165% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B19
MotherboardMSI B360M GAMING PLUS (MS-7B19)  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '22 at 17:15
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 117
2-Core 240
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 396
56% 413 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
Nvidia(10DE 1455) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
165% Outstanding
Lighting 218
Reflection 308
Parallax 236
178% 254 fps
MRender 315
Gravity 234
Splatting 172
189% 240 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 165%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 128G 128GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN7872
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 398
Write 403
Mixed 368
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 85.4
4K Mixed 25.8
126% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 211
162% 217 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.1% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.5
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360M GAMING PLUS (MS-7B19) Builds (Compare 1,466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI B360M GAMING PLUS (MS-7B19)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback