Extracomputer GB-BXi5-5200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemExtracomputer GB-BXi5-5200  (all builds)
MotherboardGIGABYTE MQLP5AP-00
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '22 at 16:37
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5010U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 57.3
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 100
46% 74.6 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 163
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 1000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
2.06% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 6.7
0% 3.37 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 5
Splatting 9.3
6% 6.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.06%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SF6S128G1122 128GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3540000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 155 144 130 152 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 428
Write 379
Mixed 216
SusWrite 143
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 22.6
79% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 161
126% 175 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905603-015.A00G 99U5469-045.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.3% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 15.7
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 15.4
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GB-BXi5-5200 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Extracomputer GB-BXi5-5200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback