HP 24-g085na

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 24-g085na  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8245
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190604
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 16 '22 at 15:11
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Memory 51.3
1-Core 34.9
2-Core 64.3
32% 50.2 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 108
16% 115 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
HP(103C 8245) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.08% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 3.5
2% 3.1 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 3.9
2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.08%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dogfish 60GB 60GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Write 57.7
Mixed 6
7% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 0.8
6% 3.27 MB/s
DQ Read 79.5
DQ Write 87.1
DQ Mixed 0.1
23% 55.6 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 56%
Ct240bx5 0 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 170 54 86 48 36 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23% Poor
Read 276
Write 200
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 90.8
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
24% 5.67 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 23%
Great: 87%
Seagate Portable 500GB
94GB free, PID 2300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 26 25 27 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 26.7
Mixed 21
SusWrite 25.6
34% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6DFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 24-g085na Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP 24-g085na

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback